Skip to content

Inspection of a Commercial Property

The Commercial Property Inspector is a qualified Building Code inspector. He is a Certified Building Code Official with the Ontario Building Officials Association and is fully qualified on Large Buildings and Part 3 of the Ontario Building Code. An unknowing inspector may lead you to believe your property is code compliant when you could in fact be faced with spending thousands or tens of thousands in required building code upgrades.

In the late sixties and early seventies, copper prices rose and contractors/electricians switched from copper to lower costing aluminum wiring. Knowing your property has aluminum wiring prior to purchasing could be a huge money saver for you. Many insurance companies will not insure a building containing aluminum wiring and the cost of retrofitting a property could be prohibitive due to budgeting.

 

Asbestos is another common hazard found in older buildings and removal of any sizable amounts can be very expensive. Class 2 removal of asbestos covers containment, removal of the asbestos, disposal of the asbestos. Workers have to be trained and properly encapsulated while dealing with the asbestos. Penalties can be severe if work is not performed by licensed personnel. Older boilers were typically coated with asbestos and old hot water and steam lines. Having a property inspection can identify these issues prior to purchase.

Moisture and mould can often be present in older buildings that have water or roof problems. Any time you have moisture present in a heated environment you have the possibility of mould being present. Mould cleanup can also be very expensive as the clean up crew may have to wear respiratory protection, eye protection and disposable clothing.

Thermal imaging cameras are used to inspect roofs for hidden leaks and potential areas of failure. We also check electrical panels for hot spots and conditions that might lead to failure or even an electrical fire. Our years of experience coupled with this technology can identify potential problems that can cost an investor unneeded expenses.

The Commercial Property Inspector has inspected Plaza’s, Strip Malls, Office Complex’s, Factories and Industrial Buildings, Churches, Mixed Use Commercial, residential apartment buildings, Commercial Leases and properties valued up to 30 million dollars. We use the lastest equipment and all our staff are highly trained in the Ontario Building Code and have many years of practical experience which ensures your investment will be protected. All inspections are performed to ASTM E2018 standard and report is based on PCA format.

Learn more aboutCommercial Property Inspections. Stop by www.barrie101.com where you can find out all about theToronto Commercial Property Inspector and what he can do for you.

Aluminum Wiring – Hazards and Solutions

Primarily in the 1960s and 1970s, many electrical contractors used aluminum wiring instead of copper wiring as a way to save money and lower construction costs. However, a number of electrical fires have been attributed to aluminum wiring. Many building codes have been rewritten to not allow the use of aluminum wire for branch circuit wiring in houses.

Copper vs. Aluminum — The Test Results are in! Tests have demonstrated aluminum wiring has inherent properties that make it more susceptible to fires when it was not installed correctly. Here are some of the problems with using aluminum wiring to conduct electricity. Aluminum does not conduct electricity as well as copper. An aluminum wire generates more heat. Aluminum is more brittle than copper. Wire is more likely to break or crimp if it is brittle. Arcing can occur if a wire breaks or crimps. This can cause very high temperatures inside the wall or ceiling Aluminum is more likely to corrode than copper. Aluminum will oxidize if it comes in contact with moisture. This oxidation removes the pure aluminum and makes the wire thinner. A thinner wire creates more heat when electrical current is running through it. Oxidation also causes the wire to expand, puts pressure on the protective plastic coating on the wire, and can cause the plastic to split. If any of these occur, arcing may result which can cause fires. Aluminum expands and contracts more than copper. This puts additional stress at all connections such as outlets and switches. If these become loose, arcing can occur at these points. If contemplating buying an older home with aluminum wiring or updating a home with aluminum wiring, contact a certified electrician to gain their expertise and opinion regarding the dangers of aluminum wiring.

State Farm believes the information contained in the Good Neighbor House is reliable and accurate. We cannot, however, guarantee the performance of all items demonstrated or described in all situations. Always consult an experienced contractor or other expert to determine the best application of these ideas or products in your home.
Between 1965 and 1973, aluminum wiring was used to install electrical branch circuits in about 1.5 million homes in the United States and Canada. Subsequent fires in some of these homes were attributed to faulty aluminum wire connections. During this period, studies conducted by the National Fire Protection Association, in conjunction with the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission, revealed that homes using aluminum wires manufactured before 1972 are 55 times more likely to have one or more electrical connections reach fire hazard condition than homes wired with copper. Aluminum wiring in itself is not dangerous. Aluminum wiring, when properly installed, can be just as safe as copper. But if it has not been installed properly, the connections-where the wires join to the outlets and switches- can present a fire hazard.

How to Tell The wiring that is of concern involves the circuit wiring to your outlets and light switches, and to appliances that us 115 volt current, such as furnace and washing machine. It is a single-strand, solid aluminum wire, silver in color as opposed to the characteristic copper wiring color. Most homes of any vintage employ some aluminum wiring. Often service entrance cables from the street that run to the distribution panel and major appliance circuits (220v) are aluminum. The safety concerns are not with the cables, but rather with branch circuit connections involving the lighting and other 115 v circuits. The Problem Most problems arise with solid aluminum wire, sizes #10 and #12 gauge. These problems concern the ends, or terminations, of the aluminum wire, where they connect under the bonding screws. If the connections are improperly installed, there is a potential for intermittent, hot connections where the wires join to the outlets and switches. Again, the problem is with the connections, and not with the wiring itself. The main difficulty with connections using aluminum wiring is a phenomenon known as cold creep. Aluminums coefficient of expansion (how much it expands when electrical current passes through it) is higher than coppers. Simply put, when aluminum wiring warms up, it expands more than copper does, and when it cools down, it contracts more than copper does. This expansion and contraction, over time, will allow for loosening at the connections. Also aluminum wire needs to be larger than copper to carry the same amount of electricity. Because the wires are thicker, you cannot get the same tightness at the connections. Therefore, they may loosen more quickly. To make the problem worse, all metals oxidize or corrode in an oxygen environment. Copper oxidation forms as a conductor, while aluminum develops as a resistor. This resistance causes heat. Oxidation accelerates when two unlike metals are in contact with each other. This may be part of the source of increased resistance when aluminum wire joins to outlets or switches intended for copper. Eventually the wire may start getting very hot, melt the insulation or fixture its attached to, and possibly even cause a fire. Evaluation of Your Electrical System As mentioned above, aluminum wiring can be just as safe as copper when properly installed. Denver’s Building Department has always maintained-including during the years 1965 to 1977, when aluminum wiring was being installed nationwide- a force of electrical inspectors who themselves are licensed electricians and have worked diligently to ensure that all installations comply with local and national standards. Many of the incidents publicized from other parts of the country simply don’t occur here. Still, any potential electrical problem is a potentially serious problem.

There are several warning signs to look for that would suggest the possibility of connection problems. They are:
- Sparks emanating from outlets
- Warm-to-touch cover plates on outlets and switches
- Smoke coming from outlets, junction boxes or switches
- Lights that flicker for no apparent reason
- Melted insulation (plastic) at the connections
- Smell of burning plastic at outlets
- Light bulbs that burn out quickly, or shine unusually bright
- Blown fuses or tripped breakers for no apparent reason
- The size of your television picture shrinks

Making Sure Its Safe
If you are experiencing one or more of the above connection problems, or are otherwise concerned, we suggest that you hire a licensed electrician to check over the wiring for the following:
1. Outlets and switches directly attached to aluminum wiring shall be listed for that purpose. The device will be stamped with AL/CU or CO/ALR. The latter supersedes the former, but both are safe. These fixtures are somewhat more expensive than the ordinary ones.
2. Wire should be properly connected (wrapped at least way around the screw in a clockwise direction). Connections should be tight. While repeated tightening of the screws can make the problem worse, during the inspection it would pay off to have the electrician snug up each connection.
3. Push-in terminals (terminals where the connecting wire is pushed into a slot rather than wound around a screw) are an extreme hazard with aluminum wire. Any connections using push-in terminals should be redone with the proper screw connections immediately.
4. There should be no signs of overheating darkened connections, melted insulation, or baked outlets or switches. Any such damage should be repaired.
5. Connections between aluminum and copper wire need to be handled specially. Current Denver City Ordinance requires that the connections used must be specially marked for connecting aluminum to copper. The National Electrical Code requires that the wire be a connected together using special crimp device, with antioxidant grease (see Repair Options, over).
6. National Electrical Code, Sections 110-114 and 310-314 address electrical conductors of dissimilar metals and prohibit the use of unlisted twist-on connectors for connection of copper and aluminum wiring.

A Final Caution The United States Fire Administration reports that annually, of the nearly 800,000 residential fire nationwide, approximately 75,000 began in the homes electrical distribution system that is, in the circuit wiring, receptacles, switches, cords and plugs. When a part of this network fails or is misused, a fire may result. Many of these fires were attributed to old technology aluminum branch circuit wiring. Of the fires involving old technology aluminum branch circuit wiring, 75 percent of the incidents involved receptacles, 12 percent involved panel equipment terminals, and 10 percent involved twist-on connections. Fire investigators, including those of the Denver Fire Departments Fire Prevention and Investigation Division, determined that old technology aluminum-wired receptacles and twist-on connectors, when used with aluminum wire, were failure prone, even when installed carefully in accordance with the manufacturers instructions. Leave aluminum wiring safety improvements to licensed electrical contractors. Denvor Building Department electrical inspectors will monitor work done under City permit. Any time you suspect unusual heat or smoke generated from the electrical system in your house, do not hesitate to call 911 and request a Fire Company to respond and evaluate conditions. The safety of your family is of primary importance.

This article by the Denver Fire Department is brought to you by Napoleon Home Inspections – The Barrie Home Inspector

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Deck Collapse – Is Your Deck Safe?

Safety Alert: Study Reveals Sharp Increase in Deck Failures A landmark study reveals that there have been 179 reported deck collapses from January2000 through December 2006, killing 33 and injuring 1,122.By: Michael Morse, Brittney Corwin, Robert Morse and Andrew JohnsonIn September 2006, a particularly violent deck collapse occurred. What made this collapse so frightening was it occurred with surprisingly little impetus. The potential purchasers, a family of five, were doing a final walkthrough on a single-family house in a quiet, older subdivision in Lawrenceville, Georgia. The house was situated on a lot that sloped away from the street. The back sliding door was about 12’ above grade. There was a well built and well maintained 12’ by 15’ deck overlooking a wooded backyard. When the husband, wife, and two of their teenage children stepped out onto the deck, it pulled off the house… but it did not just fall down. As the deck pulled away from the house, the deck swung underneath, struck the outside support columns, and landed upside down. The family fell to the ground and the deck, now upside down, landed on top of them. They were trapped underneath the deck, injured and traumatized. Emergency services were called and the family was transported to the hospital. Fortunately, the deck’s guardrail acted like a roll bar and held the deck off the ground, preventing the victims from being crushed.Why did this happen? How could a solidly built structure just detach and collapse?
While the deck itself was structurally sound, the connection of the deck to the house was not. When the family walked onto the deck and then stopped, their momentum was transferred to the fasteners that held the deck to the house. That little bit of movement was just enough to overcome the friction holding the fasteners to the house rim joist. The deck simply pulled away from the house.
Since the deck was built to the standards prescribed by national building code, it was supposed to be capable of accommodating the weight of 48 people, but it only took four people to bring it down. Why?Scope of the problemThere is no reliable source for statistics on how many decks there are in the United States, how many decks are being built annually, or by whom. Several indirect approaches were used to generate reasonable estimates relating to deck construction and the number of decks there are in the United States. Information was collected referencing housing starts, home design trends, and the do-it-yourself market.Home BuildersGrowth of the decking industry is partly driven by sales of new homes. The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) estimated housing starts in 2006 to be nearly 2 million units houses being built today new home options in 2006. This number does not include new decks installed on older homes, or renovations of older decks.Deck BuildersThe North American Deck and Rail Association (NADRA) estimates the annual retail installed value of deck components and accessories in the United States to have been between $9 and $10 billion in 2005 coming years. In fact, NADRA was started in response to this terrific growth. Based on a 2005 survey performed by national retailers, the average cost of a deck is approximately $11,300 decks were constructed in 2005 alone.HomeownersDeck construction appears to be simple and straight forward, and many homeowners undertake the project themselves. With readily available calculators, guides, and premade construction plans, it is easy to see why deck building has become one of the most common ‘do-it-yourself’ projects. Although this group makes a significant impact on the decking market, there was no apparent way to quantify its contribution.House Design InfluenceIn 2005, more than 60% of all new homes either came with a deck, or incorporated the opportunity for future outdoor living space delay the construction of a deck, the layout of the house includes, and anticipates, this future addition.While some homeowners may choose to Subdivisions, such as this town-house community, can be found across the United States. It is clear that these homes were designed to include a structure outside of the rear door. The rim joist located just below this door was intended to be the point of attachment for the future deck. Building CodesThe International Residential Code (IRC) is one of the primary references for both deck builders and code officials. It contains instructions on how to build reliable and safe structures. General requirements for all structures, including decks, are in Chapter 3, Section R301 Design Criteria. This section states that: “Buildings and structures, and all parts thereof, shall be constructed to safely support all loads, including dead loads, live loads, roof loads, flood loads, snow loads, wind loads and seismic loads as prescribed by this code. The construction of building and structures shall result in a system that provides a complete load path capable of transferring all loads from their point of origin through the load-resisting elements to the foundation.”Specifications concerning decks are found in the chapter on floors (Chapter 5) of the IRC. One section that is written specifically for decks (R502.2.2 Decks), provides a very brief and non-prescriptive recap on how decks must be attached and supported. “Where supported by attachment to an exterior wall, decks shall be positively anchored to the primary structure and designed for both vertical and lateral loads as applicable. Such attachment shall not be accomplished by the use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal. Where positive connection to the primary building structure cannot be verified during inspection, decks shall be self-supporting.”All other guidance must be derived from sections that do not specifically cite deck construction. They are written with house building, not deck building, in mind.The Study of Reported Deck CollapsesThis study seeks to better define the scope of deck failures in the United States by providing statistical evidence of the problem. This report includes deck, porch, and associated collapses that were reported from January 2000 through the end of 2006. Although a few Internet sites referenced deck failures, no central source of data was found.MethodologyUntil now, conclusions drawn on deck collapse were based on a very limited sample size. This report hopes to establish a database with a statistically significant sample size, and to then identify trends, characteristics, or weaknesses. In order to draw accurate conclusions on deck failure, there must be adequate data to analyze.Deck collapse or deck failure, for the purpose of this report, is defined as a single negative structural event that renders a deck non-functional. If a deck either detaches or shifts away from the primary structure, it would be included in the study.An incident report form was developed, completed, and archived for every collapse. Data sought for each event includes: the height and size of the deck, construction materials, occupancy and activity at time of collapse, and cause of failure. These data points were then analyzed to identify trends or patterns.The data used for this report was gathered through comprehensive searches of Internet and periodical archives using key phrases including deck collapse, deck injury, rail collapse, etc. Great care was taken to include all legitimate events; that is, events based on construction technique rather than an unrelated accident.Source of InformationThe primary source of information detailing deck collapses is the news media. News reports focus on injuries sustained rather than the actual cause of the event. Reporters reflect the statements of emergency responders or eye witnesses, neither of which are focused on the physics or engineering of the deck structure. The cause that was initially reported may be different than what a subsequent investigation would find. This lack of complete information can lead to flawed assumptions as to the cause of deck failure.Correcting the design defects that cause deck failure is impossible if solutions are based on inaccurate information. Deck collapses are reported as isolated events. Very little background information is provided on the scope of this problem. Subsequent reporting could include the reasons why decks go down in the United States. There have been news segments on building a better deck; however, there also should be reports on the actual causes of failures and segments on preventing deck collapse.Data, Trends, and Analysis DataFrom January 2000 through December 2006, there were 179 reports of deck and railing failure. In these events 1,938 people were exposed to injury; they were either on or under the deck when the failure occurred. Of those involved, 1,122 sustained injuries, and 33 people died. This translates into 58% of the people involved in reported deck and railing failure were injured or killed.Virtually no municipalities perform an investigation that documents the cause of the deck collapse. A smaller sample was used to investigate this trend. Out of all the collapses included in the subcategory, only one such report was found.TrendsAn examination of the data on reported deck collapses reveals several interesting trends. Deck collapses are increasing at an average rate of 21% per year. Twice the number of deck collapses occur as compared to the rest of the year.There is a well-defined deck collapse season (June through August) in which over. Virtually all reported deck collapses occur while the deck is occupied. AnalysisAn analysis of the data and trends for deck collapse has led to the following observations.DECK CONSTRUCTIONReported deck collapse. This type of failure includes the separation of the rim joist from the house floor joists, the separation of the ledger board from the rim joist, and the separation of the ledger board from deck joists.Failure of the house to deck ledger connection accounted for over 90% of all deck collapses. Decks are built to the same codes and standards that houses are, yet decks are more prone to collapse. Current deck connections and/or the deck components are subject to failure long before the end of the service life of the deck. Follow up investigative reports on the cause of collapses are rarely generated.Ninety-five percent of reported collapses occurred when the decks were occupied.ConclusionAre there right ways (or, more importantly, wrong ways) to build decks? Is anyone watching?An analysis of deck collapse data indicates that deck connections are subject to failure long before the end of the service life of the other components of the deck. The lack of structural redundancy, especially at the critical connection points, leads to deck collapse.Specifically, deck collapse is related to the connection assembly of the deck ledger board to the house substructure. In the scenario where the house was built to accommodate a deck, it is assumed that the floor joist system of the house was constructed to support a deck. This intention was known by the architect, the builder, and the homeowner. Was it known by the framing contractor? A better question is: did the framer prepare the point of attachment (the rim joist) for the loads associated with a deck in use? Can this rim joist resist the pull out force exerted by a deck, no matter how large?When a deck collapses, people are injured, or worse. A design flaw in deck construction may lead to these catastrophic events. One can disagree with the process used to estimate the number of decks being built, but the underlying fact is that the growing number of decks in existence will directly translate into a proportionally larger number of collapses, which presents a significant public health risk.When a deck is bolted to a house, the strength and durability of this attachment depends primarily on the ability of the rim joist of the house to transfer the load to the house foundation. Unfortunately, the rim joist was not designed to resist the pullout action imposed by a deck. Current building codes provide details for the installation of rim boards. These details are the same whether or not a deck is to be attached. Building codes should require additional anchoring for the rim joist when constructing decks and/or houses onto which decks will most likely be attached.As with any new development, there is a learning curve to discover the long-term performance of a product. The shortcomings of current deck construction must be studied, understood, and addressed. A factor that complicates this process is the incredible number of new decking products and techniques that are constantly being introduced. There is no time to slow down and evaluate the effect that one individual product or new technique has on the overall structural performance. With new products and new techniques being introduced so quickly, there is no easy way to generate a base line of deck performance against which to evaluate change.The popularity of outdoor living space is growing despite the increasing number of deck collapses. There is a perception that each collapse is an isolated event that is dependant on the quality of the deck builder, as opposed to part of a larger trend predicated on a design or structural flaw of the deck’s critical connections.The public is not aware of the increasing danger associated with deck failure, largely because of a lack of conclusive data. A central database is needed to collect and analyze reports on deck collapses, the cause of the collapse, the number and severity of injuries, and the associated costs. Only after this information is assembled can the effect on public safety be evaluated and addressed.A central database is now being created to allow for the archiving of deck collapse events. The purpose of this new database is to provide information for the further study of deck collapses.A Bad WinterThe winter of 1996 saw an unusual amount of snowfall in North Dakota. As it continued to snow in the Fargo area, a repetitive phenomenon occurred: deck after deck collapsed under the weight of the accumulating snow.The number of collapses intrigued a local deck builder. Mr. Todd Funfar, President of Deck Masters, began keeping a photographic log of deck failures. He cataloged over eighty separate collapses that occurred during the winter of 1996.A review of his photographs leads to the following observations:.The deck detached from the house foundation, either from the house band board or from the outside support beams, and then dropped. This suggests that the deck joist system was capable of carrying loads greater than the capacity of the ledger connection and/or outside load beam connection.Rather than the deck floor joists breaking mid-span, decks simply detached from house.The loads increased very slowly and over an extended period of time. As it snowed, the weight grew greater, exerting a sustained load on the decks throughout the winter months. Normally, loads on a deck are applied quickly and for a much shorter period.Due to adverse weather conditions, this series of collapses occurred without the condition. Heat from the house would induce snowmelt adjacent to the ledger board. .The most common point of failure was the connection of the ledger board to the house. While the mechanics of ledger failure varied, the result was the same; the assembly that links the deck and the house floor joists failed, causing the deck to collapse. With the Fargo collapses, the conclusion that can be drawn is that the connection of the deck to the house was not adequate to transfer the loads from the deck, through the boards and hardware, to the foundation of the house.As an aside, while researching reports of deck collapses (covering hundreds and hundreds of hours in national archives and internet search engines) not one of the collapses from the North Dakota winter was discovered.

The deck connections and deck components were in a prolonged wet service.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Why You Need a Home Inspection

Why You Need A Home Inspection
by Roger Frost

A home inspection is a limited, non-invasive examination of the condition of a home, often in connection with the sale of that home. Home inspections are usually conducted by a home inspector who has the training and certifications to perform such house defects that matter by the Barrie Home Inspectorinspections.

The inspector prepares and delivers to the client a written report of findings. The client then uses the knowledge gained to make informed decisions about their pending real estate purchase. The home inspector describes the condition of the home at the time of inspection but does not guarantee future condition, efficiency, or life expectancy of systems or components.

We know the home-buying process can be very stressful, and nothing could be worse than suddenly finding out that there are major defects with the property you just purchased. Having your property inspected prior to purchase can give you Peace of Mind knowing exactly what condition your home is in and what problems or repairs are required.

If you are buying a rural property it is always a wise decision to have your septic system and well inspected. Most professional home inspectors will suggest you hire a professional for both these inspections. Septic tank systems are located underground and a professional installer will typically pump out your tank and evaluate the bed from conditions he finds during this process.

GuaranteedResidentialInspections.com is located in Barrie ON, and offers a 100% Money Back Guarantee on every residential and commercial building inspection. They also offer Free Thermal Imaging scans with every inspection. As a Certified Building Code Official and a former Registered Builder with Hudac his experience far exceeds that of the competition. With over 4,000 building inspections the Barrie Home inspector should be your first choice when wanting to protect your investment.

The savvy home buyer will accompany the Home Inspector and learn about their new home. Asking questions is recommended and every item is discussed in detail to ensure a complete understanding of any issues covered by the home inspector. The client receives an overview of entire inspection at the conclusion, a computerized report and a PDF copy of his home inspection report for his records.

Want to find out more about <a href="http://www.GuaranteedResidentialInspections.com">Home Inspections in Barrie ON</a>, then visit www.GuaranteedResidentialInspections.com site. fChoose the <a href="http://www.Infared-Detection.com">Barrie Home Inspector</a> for your Peace of Mind.

Solving Basement Water Problems

Many “how-to” magazines run articles touting miracle products that stop water from permeating through foundations or basement walls and floors. While some products may be effective at mitigating water migration through cracks or flaws in a wall, blocking groundwater can be as tough as keeping water from leaking through split seams of a wooden boat. So long as any part of the boat is in the water, a certain amount of water is bound to find its way inside.

Never wait until water enters the basement or permeates the foundation before treating the root cause. The resulting dampness is both distasteful and potentially dangerous, even if there is no noticeable standing water.

There are four ways that moisture can permeate foundations or enter and collect in basements:

High groundwater table Surface (rain)
water leaking through openings or flaws in the walls Condensation Broken plumbing and/or irrigation runoff High Groundwater Table

Wet basements are a very common problem, particularly in low-lying areas or mountains where high water tables are common. This means that the ground water level has risen up to its high point for the year due to melting snow, spring rains, lack of water pickup by the trees and plants, and the absence of sun to dry the ground during the winter. Some soils such as clay bind water tightly, keeping the water table high for extended periods. Porous soils including sands and gravels pass water quickly, yet often have high springtime water tables, especially in low areas due to excess springtime runoff. Unfortunately, many homes are built with inadequate protection from groundwater, even though site conditions may be well suited for the proper installation of a simple and cost-effective drainage system.

Once a water problem is discovered after a house is built, it is very difficult and expensive to remedy. If left unchecked, structural and health-related problems may persist. Excessive moisture not only results in a musty smell or damage to carpet and wood flooring materials, but it promotes growth of mold spores, which can result in asthmatic symptoms in many people. For this reason, the use of vapor barriers under slabs as well as other drainage techniques are essential to keeping your home dry year-round.

To help illustrate the high groundwater problem, imagine a 12″-high pile of sand in the middle of your bathtub — with six inches of water in the tub around it. If you were to dig a six-inch-deep hole in the sand, you would find water at the bottom of the hole. By adding more water to the tub, the water level in the hole would rise as the surrounding water reached equilibrium due to hydrostatic pressure. This simulates the effect of a higher water table acting on a foundation. Now, inserting a watertight box into the hole would cause it to float. If there were holes in the box, water would seep inside. In this analogy, the box is the basement or foundation, and the tub water is groundwater.

Wrong Culprit

Years ago I did a job for a homeowner who insisted that her basement became wet only after a rainstorm. After lots of digging and waterproofing, (and continued water in the basement) I was left with a serious question about the real source of the water. Finally I started checking the house plumbing and discovered a leak in the water heater! I’ve learned to more be suspicious.

Keeping Water Out Ironically, making residential basements absolutely watertight can lead to other problems if not properly engineered. For example, basements of many commercial buildings in highly developed areas are built watertight.

However, their construction costs are extremely high compared to typical residential basements because their foundations and floor systems are built to far more stringent specifications. This is not only to keep water out, but to keep the high pressure of outside water from causing structural damage.

Consider this real-life situation that occurred a few years ago: During one extremely rainy night, a family awakened to a strange sound coming from their basement. Apparently, excess rainwater had saturated the ground around their home given its location in the lowest section of their development. The extreme pressure from the accumulated ground water actually buckled up the basement floor, causing the soil from under the floor to erupt six feet, covering their washer and dryer. The sudden soil displacement undermined the overall foundation, causing one of the walls to fall over a foot. The house was abandoned for massive structural repairs. Although this is an extreme example, it demonstrates the powerfully destructive force of water. This foundation was built in a manner similar to many residential basements. Yet, by allowing the groundwater pressure to rise without relief, failure resulted in the weakest part of the structure which, in this case, happened to be the concrete floor. Ironically, if homes were absolutely watertight, they might even float like the box in the bathtub, resulting in an unstable structure.

Current building codes require homes have sump pumps to discharge out any water that might leak in which could otherwise damage the basement. Fortunately, as water is pumped out of the basement, the water table around the house is lowered, (like pulling the plug on the bathtub drain) relieving the “hydrostatic” pressure. This is why floating houses or erupting floors are rare.

One effective way to check the water table near a house which has a dug well is to uncover the well and measure the depth from the ground surface down to the water. Compare this depth to that of the basement floor below grade and the difference equals the depth to which the basement would flood if the water were not removed. Even if the house is located on sloping terrain, the water table remains approximately the same distance down from place to place as groundwater tends to follow the contour of the surface.

Perimeter Drains

In many situations, particularly in mountainous regions where the land is seldom flat, it is possible to drain water away from most foundations and basements by gravity rather than by pumping. The traditional method specifies a perimeter drain around the outside of a building during its construction. The drain outlet slopes downhill away from the house until it reaches the surface of the ground where it can freely discharge by gravity flow. The advantage of this method over pumping water out of a sump is that it lowers the water table around the house, preventing water from ever reaching the cellar in the first place.

In many instances where experts have been asked to troubleshoot wet basement problems, a common finding is drain pipes that were installed above the foundation footing, which allows water to rise to the level of the floor. If the builder made the additional mistake of installing the drain pipe with the weep holes facing up, then the level of water has to rise to the top of the pipe before the pipe can pick up any water. Other times there is little or no porous bedding material and pipe inlet holes can become plugged. Another problem occurs with large bedding stone. Migration of the original soil into the bedding plugs up the stone, leading to failure. Often a combination of problems may coexist.

Conventional perimeter drains are usually constructed with 4″ pipe laid at the base of the footing. Most contractors use 1 1/2″ crushed stone around the outside of PVC or thinwall perforated septic system pipe which has 1/2″ or 5/8″ holes every few inches. Usually this is entirely satisfactory, though in some cases capillary action (wicking) within the soil can make the basement floor damp even though it is a few inches above the artificially lowered water table.

Due to the severe conditions encountered when building a home several years ago, the following example illustrates an improved method. Just as sitework started, the property was deluged with rain. The rain aggravated an already difficult groundwater situation, threatening postponement of construction. However, with patience (and a good pair of rubber boots), perimeter drains were installed four feet outside of where the house was to be located. Within days of installing the drains, excavation for the basement was able to proceed as if it were a dry summer. The home is built into the ground about six feet deep on a gently sloping hill. Several years have since passed and the home has never been bothered by moisture in the basement. This is in spite of the original springtime water table just two feet below the surface of the ground. This same procedure is excellent for drying out existing wet basements where conditions permit.

Ensuring Effective Drainage

The first consideration is setting the drain pipe deep enough to lower the water table well below the floor in order to reduce the effects of capillary action (wicking). Another way to reduce this effect — generally limited to new construction — is to install a layer of crushed stone entirely under the basement floor. Water cannot “wick” through this coarse aggregate. Although this is more costly, it is good insurance for a dry basement. Alternatively, installing the drain pipe a little lower may be a very cost-effective alternative, assuming there is sufficient side hill grade to ensure gravity discharge well away from the structure.

For new construction and retrofit situations, place the drain pipe a foot or more lower than the footing whenever possible and far enough away to avoid undermining the foundation. Generally 2′ to 4′ or even more is necessary to protect landscaping or porches and similar structures. In retrofit situations, installing a drain on the upgrade side of the house can yield a significant improvement, as it is usually only necessary to intercept water moving through the ground toward the house to eliminate the moisture problem. This type of drain is considered a “curtain drain” rather than a footing or perimeter drain, especially if it is several feet from the house. Its job is to lower the water table downgrade in order to protect the house. The curtain drain method is an important consideration particularly for retrofit installations as it can reduce site disruption and the resulting cost of excavation.

some checking and told the folks that a gravity drain could probably solve the problem. They went ahead and had one installed and have had no more trouble with unexpected flooding or pump maintenance since. What is surprising is that it took a college education and several years in the construction field before I was able to make such a simple and obvious recommendation. Yet I know of similar situations that exist today, and houses that are being built where sump pumps are expected to do what could have been done with a few pieces of pipe and some planning. Many basement drainage companies still rely on sump pumps for all installations, regardless of whether or not gravity could be used to discharge the water. This creates a long-term dependence on a mechanical device. Sump pumps can get plugged up, wear out, fail to come on after months of non-use, or stop because of a power failure. Unfortunately, it is often during the worst weather conditions when power is lost in rural areas while, at the same time, excessive rainfall is causing the water table to rise. About the only assured way to protect a basement is to install a redundant pump and a separate circuit coupled with a battery-powered back-up system that automatically kicks in when all else fails. Such systems are now on the market but represent additional investment and occasional maintenance to keep them in working order. They use an automotive-type battery for power, similar to safety lights in public buildings. If there is no choice but to install a sump pump, selecting the right pump should be based on the severity of the situation. There are many types market, but the extra money spent for a high quality submersible style with a built-in switch is well worthwhile, especially in extreme situations. Excessive dampness can quickly corrode unprotected motors on pedestal pumps and a power failure that allows water to completely cover an unprotected motor can require replacement of the entire pump. Also, there are automatic switches now available that allow sump pumps to draw water down to within a fraction of an inch of the floor and to turn on when water is only slightly deeper. This can be helpful for occasionally dewatering a basement without digging a sump hole through the concrete floor. Filter Fabric: Synthetic cloth-like material that is used for several different types of construction related applications such as erosion control, road stabilization and soil separation. Can consist of either woven or non-woven fibers in varying thicknesses or weights. Available in 12 to 15 foot wide rolls several hundred feet in length. Woven fabrics (usually black) resemble the stuff that modern day grain bags and weed control fabric are made from while non-woven fabrics can resemble a range of materials from soft felts to the stiff shiny house wrap (to which they are closely related) usually seen enveloping homes under construction.

Maintenance

It is essential to keep the drain outlet running freely. The rodent guard must be kept clear of any debris. The area below the outlet must be kept cleared of leaves and debris, especially if the drain empties into a ditch. Sometimes drains that have clogged up internally can be cleared by the use of a pressure washer (or even a garden hose) to break up the clog. I’ve cleared obstructions from perimeter drains and had water drain out of the basement just like water leaving a bathtub.

Properly installed perimeter drains create an “island” out of the house site by lowering the water table completely around the house. They keep water from entering under the footings and, in my experience, provide the surest protection against any type of dampness in a basement resulting from groundwater.

There are some situations where perimeter drains are not necessary, however. A thorough knowledge of the site, or an exceptionally low water table indication from a septic system test pit, can provide such a determination. If you happen to be one of those folks already blessed with an unwanted indoor swimming pool each Spring, whether in a new or existing house, rest assured that there usually is something that can be done. However, since soil conditions vary so greatly, it is wise to consider your circumstances carefully before deciding on a course of action.

Also see the University of Minnesota Extension Bulletin Moisture in Basements: Causes and Solutions Filter material: According to the American Iron and Steel Institute’s Handbook of steel drainage and Highway Construction Products, 1967: “Early subdrains consisted of a trench filled with coarse rock (“french” drains) which quickly silted up. Extensive research by the U.S.Waterways Experiment Station at Vicksburg, Mississippi, shows that a graded material roughly equal to concrete sand (AASHO Specs) has been found most suitable. Such material gives better support to the sidewall of the trench and thereby reduces erosion and silting. Filter material should be placed in layers and tamped.” Leaks in Foundation Walls Another condition that can sometimes appear to be high ground water leaking in may simply be surface water entering over or through the foundation at bulkheads or window openings, seams between walls, and/or, flaws in the foundation.

Poor surface grading can direct water toward the lip of a bulkhead or towards basement windows where it can spill over into the basement. By not paying attention during heavy rains, a homeowner can sometimes end up blaming the wrong culprit.

Surface water leakage

Surface water leakage is reasonably easy to locate once you get on track. The solution often involves regrading to drain water away from the foundation. In the case of foundation windows, however, it is not always possible to shed water away since the bottom of the windows are often too far below the adjacent ground, requiring the installation of window wells. These often consist of corrugated galvanized steel half circles but can also be made of pressure treated wood or masonry. The goal is to make the top of the window well high enough to be able to slope the surrounding ground surface away from the house. A problem arises when the window well is directly below the roof drip, especially in cold, wet climates where rain gutters are seldom used (because snow and ice fills them, making them useless, or ripping them from the building!)

The solution is either to cover the window well with a clear plastic dome which also keeps out leaves and critters or to create a mini-drywell under the window well to allow rainwater to soak away into the ground before it can rise up and find its way through the window. This leads to another issue: porosity or flaws in the wall itself. If a foundation wall is totally watertight there is little problem with letting water run down against it all the way to the perimeter drain. If the wall has had adequate damp-proofing and/or the water drains quickly through the soil, there is little to be concerned about. The problem is that many foundations are have defects and hairline cracks which allow water infiltration.

Sources of Leaks in Foundation Walls

Concrete block foundations often crack in the grout joint between blocks. Even poured concrete or ICF walls can develop shrinkage or settling cracks in addition to water channels from anchor bolts and form ties. Honeycombing due to improper vibration and consolidation is another source of leakage, wherein the concrete aggregate became separated leaving voids in the wall. In addition, poured walls often have seams between different stages of the pour.

Another problem exists with many of the older foundations that are constructed of various sizes and shapes of cut granite and round fieldstone. With or without mortar between, these foundations typically exhibit numerous passages for water to follow. Water can enter walls around utility penetrations such as sewer, water, gas or electrical conduits. There are several instances where I’ve been engaged to dig around existing buildings and to waterproof walls and/or install drainage systems only to discover that the actual problems were unrelated to groundwater. Having been under the direction of an architect in some cases, I’ve had to follow his recommendations rather than follow my instincts to determine the problems.

Consider this example that involved an old house with a loose stone foundation. The original work that was done under the direction of the architect only aggravated the wet basement problem. Digging a shallow perimeter drain actually allowed more water through the porous basement wall. This was the same mistake many people make when they dig out next to their foundation wall and replace the original backfill with crushed stone either for appearance and splash protection. Putting crushed stone directly over the original soil, even with the installation of a perforated drain pipe often causes more water to enter the ground. The crushed stone becomes a dispersion system in the same way it does in a septic drain field. Usually little water enters the drain pipe, except in a deluge, and more water soaks into the ground next to the foundation where it makes its way into the basement.

What I did to solve the problem was to seal the outside of the wall with a coating of concrete that directed surface water away from the foundation as it soaked into the ground, keeping it from streaming through the loose stone foundation. The addition of a bituminous asphalt coating or a Bituthene membrane can also help to keep water from penetrating the foundation wall. The success with this project has prompted me to use this technique in many other situations. Rather than using concrete, however, in most cases I rely on a layer of rubber or plastic to direct water away from the wall. Usually I excavate just a few inches below the surface next to the building and three to four feet lower at a distance of four to five feet from the wall, sloping the soil down on a 30 to 45 degree angle away from the building as I go. I rake the earth smooth, remove all rocks and sticks, and tamp it firm. Then I install a layer of rubber or a couple of layers of 6 mil polyethylene over the slope, right up to the wall. I don’t usually worry about sealing against the wall, as my primary concern is to direct the majority of the surface water away from the wall and out into the earth where it can soak harmlessly away, leaving a “dry zone” beneath the membrane next to the wall. I use this same technique under a window well if there is any question about the integrity of the wall below the window. I dig out a few extra feet, slope the soil, install the plastic membrane on the slope, place crushed stone as a mini drywell for any rainwater that may enter, install the window well structure and then backfill to the surface as discussed.

This technique of installing a membrane just below the ground surface is similar to installing “flashing” around a chimney or other structure on a roof. One of its biggest benefits is that it can eliminate the need to completely excavate a foundation wall all the way to the footing and attempting to waterproof it. It is somewhat similar to installing a full length “splash block” mentioned in other basement drainage articles on the Internet except that it is out of sight. I’ve also had success with this technique even when attempts to make the wall watertight below have failed.

Republished by Blog Post Promoter